Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Dubai HD Videos.....
Sunday, September 27, 2009
A Fund Of Surprises
I could get used to this business of being bewildered......
( Dilip D'Souza, Outlook)
Dilip Kumar : Master At Work......
World's expiry date: 21 December 2012?
London September 25 :
The world will end on 21 December 2012, claims "web-bot" technology that has pushed apocalyptic prophecy into the internet age.
According to web's conspiracy theorists, the bots accurately predicted the September 11 attacks and the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami, and now they believe that a cataclysm of some sort will devastate the planet on 21 December, 2012.
Developed in the 1990s to predict stock market movements, the software is similar to the "spiders" that search engines use to index web pages.
The bots crawl through relevant web pages, noting keywords and examining the text around them. The theory is that this gives an insight into the "wisdom of crowds", as the thoughts of thousands of people are aggregated, reports The Telegraph.
George Ure, the project’s "co-mind", says that his system predicted a "world-changing event" in the 60 to 90 days after June 2001, and on 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks happened.
Despite the vagueness of this prediction, many believed it to be genuine.
Now, the latest prediction is that 21 December 2012 signals the end of the world, possibly through a "polar shift" – when the polarity of the Earth's magnetic field is reversed. Believers claim that as well as the bots, the 2012 apocalypse is predicted by the ancient Mayan calendar, the Book of Revelations, and the Chinese text I Ching.
Friday, September 25, 2009
Difficult Date !
He said, "Why have you been avoiding me all this time? You wouldn't even make eye contact."
"Oh," said the waitress, "I thought you wanted more coffee."
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Courier by Microsoft
Courier: First Details of Microsoft's Secret Tablet
It feels like the whole world is holding its breath for the Apple tablet. But maybe we've all been dreaming about the wrong device. This is Courier, Microsoft's astonishing take on the tablet.
Courier is a real device, and we've heard that it's in the "late prototype" stage of development. It's not a tablet, it's a booklet. The dual 7-inch (or so) screens are multitouch, and designed for writing, flicking and drawing with a stylus, in addition to fingers. They're connected by a hinge that holds a single iPhone-esque home button. Statuses, like wireless signal and battery life, are displayed along the rim of one of the screens. On the back cover is a camera, and it might charge through an inductive pad, like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre..................
CricTrivia
The record in this regard is held by the former South African wicketkeeper Dave Richardson, who took 119 Test catches before finally managing a stumping, against India in Cape Town in 1996-97. He expressed his relief at the time, saying he hadn't wanted to end his career with no stumpings at all in case people thought he was a good slip fielder rather than a wicketkeeper! He ended up with 150 catches and two stumpings in his 42 Tests.
As I write the whole of New Zealand lead Sachin Tendulkar by 26 - there have been 70 ODI centuries by New Zealand batsmen. Tendulkar (44) is in front of Zimbabwe (36) and Bangladesh (15) though. Largely thanks to him, India lead the way overall with 163 ODI centuries: Australia have 146, Pakistan 141, West Indies 130, Sri Lanka 98, England 90 and South Africa 85.
Honest !
Teacher: Well, at least there's one good thing I can
Parent: What's that?
Teacher: With grades like these, he couldn't be cheating.
Monday, September 21, 2009
17 laws of Teamwork
The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork By John Maxwell4 |
|
Dubai
From The Economist print edition
| |
THE new metro in Dubai, the glitziest but most heavily indebted of the seven statelets making up the United Arab Emirates (UAE), is not the world’s biggest, fastest or costliest. But even in these straitened times, the city-state has rolled out this latest bauble with its usual flair. In flowing robes, amid laser lights and red carpets, Sheikh Mohammed al-Maktoum, Dubai’s ruler, launched the inaugural service on the auspicious date of 9/9/2009.
Built by a Japanese consortium in just four years, the driverless system’s first line comes complete with sleekly futuristic air-conditioned stations, leather seating for first-class passengers and carriages specially designated for women. The Arabian peninsula’s first urban railway looks swell, it may unclog the roads and should be a welcome convenience to the ordinary folk who cater to Dubai’s plushily motorised elite.
And yet Dubai’s economy is still stalled on the tracks. Though the cost of commercial rents has fallen by half since the start of the year, nearly a quarter of Dubai’s office space is empty. A third of all building projects are reckoned to be frozen, yet so much new space is still coming on to the market that the glut may persist well into next year. The general slump, after years of breakneck growth and soaring prices, has spread its poison through the economy. A survey in a local magazine finds that workers across the UAE this year have taken salary cuts of 26-30%.
Sheikh Mohammed recently likened his realm’s troubles to the headwinds slowing down an aircraft. Insisting that those winds were now blowing less fiercely, he dismissed worries about government debts, which are estimated to total anything between $80 billion and $120 billion (equal to 100-150% of GDP). Dubai’s intricate web of parastatal corporations controlled by the Maktoums may indeed find the cash to tide them over.
There is plenty of it still sloshing around. Where else would a government think of selling seat-belts with designer labels to promote road safety? The friendly neighbouring emirate of Abu Dhabi, which has been bailing Dubai out, is still flush with petrodollars. And Dubai still draws customers by being a pleasanter place than other Gulf destinations. Yet even Sheikh Mohammed, whose ambition has inspired Dubai’s furious drive for superlatives, says he will now be more careful.
As for the metro, it is debatable whether the $7.6 billion investment will make a profit even after more of it becomes operational in five years. Dubai’s rapid-transit authority says it could cut traffic by 17%, and slash losses due to delays. But how many of Dubai’s 1.6m people will give up their 1m air-conditioned cars to walk even short distances in the punishing summer heat? At any rate, the sheikh can console himself with the knowledge that the metro will be the world’s biggest computer-operated train system, and its Union Station will have the world’s biggest underground railway concourse.
Beware of how you use your office computer !
From The Economist print edition
More than ever, companies want to know what their employees are up to
| |
Your every keystroke, silently logged |
IF THE workers at Japan’s Keihin Electric Express Railway Company seem unnaturally cheerful for drizzly autumn mornings, it is because they are being watched. The firm has installed cameras with special scanners at 15 of its stations to measure employees’ smiles, ensuring that harried commuters are always greeted with a grin, however forced.
It may seem extreme to Western eyes but it is just one example of a business that is booming: employee monitoring. Companies have long kept a close eye on employees to maintain productivity and guard against theft. But the economic downturn has prompted some to redouble their efforts—and advances in technology have given them the means.
A recent report from Gartner, a consultancy, found that spending on security software rose by 18.6% to $13.5 billion in 2008. The market for security information and event management software (SIEM), which can be used to mine e-mails for keywords and security breaches, grew by 50% according to Gartner. The fastest-growing area is network forensic software, which lets firms record and playback exactly what happens on employees’ computer screens, and can even record keystrokes.
Gartner’s John Pescatore says the software is “like a giant TiVo” or “a security camera pointed at a till in a bank”. This niche doubled in value between 2007 and 2008, from $25m to $50m. Mr Pescatore predicts that the market will jump another 50% by the end of this year.
Companies use this kind of software, for example, to monitor employees who are about to leave, whether through redundancy or choice, to make sure they do not take sensitive information with them. Managers can spot the moment that an embittered salesperson copies a client database onto a flash-memory stick.
Financial-services firms are particularly vulnerable to the enemy within. The case of Sergey Aleynikov, the Goldman Sachs banker accused in July of stealing high-frequency trading software worth millions of dollars to the bank, was an illustration of the huge value of intellectual property that is at risk of going astray.
Companies also use monitoring software to protect employees from themselves. Malicious software often infects a corporate network by exploiting security holes in web browsers to infiltrate a PC when its user visits a dodgy website. Compromised machines can then be linked up to form “botnets” under external control, which are used to send spam e-mails or disable websites with a flood of bogus requests. When Procter & Gamble ran a security check of its 80,000 PCs, it found 3,000 were infected with botnet software.
Another use of employee-monitoring software is measuring productivity. Managers trying to decide who to make redundant can use forensic software to catch that slacking YouTube addict red-handed.
Even workers on the road are not safe from prying corporate eyes. Several start-up companies, such as Purewire and Zscaler, have launched software to monitor employees outside the company network. Workers accessing the internet from hotel rooms using a company laptop may be surprised to find their web browsing is being monitored by the IT department back in the office. Their page requests flow through a web monitoring service, which can block or report access to certain sites.
Monitoring software can also be used to spot “presenteeism”—employees who turn up in the office every day but then do nothing. Peter Cheese, managing director of Accenture’s talent and organisation practice, says that presenteeism has become more common as communications break down between managers and staff in firms that are under financial stress.
But although workforce-monitoring software may provide what seems like useful information, it is no help when it comes to addressing the problems it uncovers. It may also undermine morale and mutual trust. Mr Cheese warns: “If you have to check up on employees all the time, then you probably have bigger issues than just productivity.”
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Coming Soon : Washing without water
From The Economist print edition
Environment: A washing machine uses thousands of nylon beads, and just a cup of water, to provide a greener way to do the laundry
| |
Water? Who needs it? |
SYNTHETIC fibres tend to make low quality clothing. But one of the properties that makes nylon a poor choice of fabric for a shirt, namely its ability to attract and retain dirt and stains, is being exploited by a company that has developed a new laundry system. Its machine uses no more than a cup of water to wash each load of fabrics and uses much less energy than conventional devices.
The system developed by Xeros, a spin-off from the University of Leeds, in England, uses thousands of tiny nylon beads each measuring a few millimetres across. These are placed inside the smaller of two concentric drums along with the dirty laundry, a squirt of detergent and a little water. As the drums rotate, the water wets the clothes and the detergent gets to work loosening the dirt. Then the nylon beads mop it up.
The crystalline structure of the beads endows the surface of each with an electrical charge that attracts dirt. When the beads are heated in humid conditions to the temperature at which they switch from a crystalline to an amorphous structure, the dirt is drawn into the core of the bead, where it remains locked in place.
The inner drum, containing the clothes and the beads, has a small slot in it. At the end of the washing cycle, the outer drum is halted and the beads fall through the slot; some 99.95% of them are collected.
Because so little water is used and the warm beads help dry the laundry, less tumble drying is needed. An environmental consultancy commissioned by Xeros to test its system reckoned that its carbon footprint was 40% smaller than the most efficient existing systems for washing and drying laundry.
The first machines to be built by Xeros will be aimed at commercial cleaners and designed to take loads of up to 20 kilograms. Customers will still be able to use the same stain treatments, bleaches and fragrances that they use with traditional laundry systems. Nylon may be nasty to wear, but it scrubs up well inside a washing machine.
Paranoid survivor
From The Economist print edition
Andrew Grove, the former boss of Intel, believes other fields can learn from the chipmaking industry that he helped bring into being
| |
EARLIER this year Andrew Grove taught a class at Stanford Business School. As a living legend in Silicon Valley and a former boss of Intel, the world’s leading chipmaker, Dr Grove could have simply used the opportunity to blow his own trumpet. Instead he started by displaying a headline from the Wall Street Journal heralding the recent takeover of General Motors by the American government as the start of “a new era”. He gave a potted history of his own industry’s spectacular rise, pointing out that plenty of venerable firms—with names like Digital, Wang and IBM—were nearly or completely wiped out along the way.
Then, to put a sting in his Schumpeterian tale, he displayed a fabricated headline from that same newspaper, this one supposedly drawn from a couple of decades ago: “Presidential Action Saves Computer Industry”. A fake article beneath it describes government intervention to prop up the ailing mainframe industry. It sounds ridiculous, of course. Computer firms come and go all the time, such is the pace of innovation in the industry. Yet for some reason this healthy attitude towards creative destruction is not shared by other industries. This is just one of the ways in which Dr Grove believes that his business can teach other industries a thing or two. He thinks fields such as energy and health care could be transformed if they were run more like the computer industry—and made greater use of its products.
Dr Grove may be 73 and coping with Parkinson’s disease, but his wit is still barbed and his desire to provoke remains as strong as ever. Rather than slipping off to a gilded retirement of golf or gallivanting, as many other accomplished men of his age do, he is still spoiling for a fight.
His achievements mean that his provocations are worth paying attention to. He has arguably done as much as anyone to usher in the age of cheap, cheerful and ubiquitous personal computing. In part, he did this through technological prowess. He graduated at the top of his engineering class at New York’s City College (one of the few options available to him as a poor Jewish refugee from Communist-controlled Hungary). He then went on to earn a doctorate at the University of California at Berkeley, and wrote a book on semiconductors that remains a standard text.
He joined Fairchild Semiconductor, once a pioneering electronics firm, where he caught the eye of Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore. The former was a co-inventor of the integrated circuit, while the latter coined Moore’s law (which decrees, roughly, that the amount of computing power available at a given price doubles every 18 months). When the two left Fairchild to found Intel in 1968—initially to make memory chips, not microprocessors—they took the young Dr Grove with them. He eventually ended up in charge of the company, becoming chief executive in 1987. He continued in that role until 1998, when he became chairman, holding that post until 2004.
Though his scientific credentials are solid, he will probably be best remembered as a daring and successful businessman. Richard Tedlow, a historian at Harvard Business School, calls him “one of the master managers in the history of American business”. One reason is market success: under his tenure, Intel came to dominate the microprocessor industry and its market capitalisation rocketed (making it, at one point, the world’s most valuable company). A bigger reason, though, lies in how exactly he managed to steer Intel to such spectacular success.
Two particularly risky decisions he took are revealing. In “Only the Paranoid Survive”, Dr Grove’s bestselling book, he argues that every company will face a confluence of internal and external forces, often unanticipated, that will conspire to make an existing business strategy unviable. In Intel’s case, such a “strategic inflection point” arose because its memory-chip business came under heavy assault from new Japanese rivals willing to undercut any price Intel offered.
What could he do? The firm’s roots and most of its profits lay in making memory chips; Intel’s microprocessor group was just a small niche. The firm’s two founders and much of its engineering staff were too emotionally wedded to its past successes to make a break. But Dr Grove decided to bet the future of the company on microprocessors, a move that saved his company and transformed the industry.
Dr Grove thinks pharmaceutical firms should study chipmakers to accelerate learning and innovation. |
The second big decision was Dr Grove’s radical announcement that Intel would market its microchips directly to consumers. Previously, chipmakers had regarded computer-makers such as Dell and Compaq as their customers, and had not bothered with fancy advertising campaigns to end users. But Dr Grove believed that such a relationship allowed these assembly and marketing firms, which did little original research of their own, to capture too much of the value created by his firm’s innovation.
So he launched the “Intel Inside” campaign, which marketed microprocessor chips directly to consumers, starting in 1991. This incensed his rivals and his immediate customers, the computer-makers, but the strong demand for Intel’s new Pentium chip showed that the strategy had worked. True, the firm stumbled when a minor flaw was discovered in the Pentium that affected some mathematical calculations. Rather than rush to correct the problem, Intel tried to downplay it—a strategy that quickly turned into a public-relations disaster. The firm was forced to offer a replacement for all affected chips, at a cost of nearly half a billion dollars.
Painful though that was, Dr Grove now thinks this episode actually benefited the firm in two ways. First, it proved to internal sceptics that Intel really had become a consumer brand. Second, he reckons that it bolstered his efforts to improve the shoddy quality of manufacturing, to protect the firm from future fiascos. In hindsight, his risky decision to turn Intel from a component-maker into a consumer brand was a masterstroke.
Some observers have suggested that it was his family’s escape from the Nazis, and his own experience of the abuses of communism, that shaped Dr Grove’s strict management style. On this view, his demanding but meritocratic approach, rewarding ideas and knowledge over power, was a rejection of the injustices of communism.
Dr Grove, however, insists that it was his experience at City College, where talent and hard work were rewarded and where students challenged their professors without concern for rank, that impressed upon him the value of meritocracy. By contrast, he recalls an elitist, back-stabbing and lax corporate culture at Fairchild. Senior executives would stroll into the office or into meetings as late as they pleased, but blue-collar workers were penalised or even fired if they committed similar offences.
When he took control of Intel Dr Grove imposed a strict arrival time of 8am, with latecomers forced to sign a sheet. He also refused to go along with popular management trends such as flexi-time and teleworking. He was known as a blunt and demanding manager, but he also gained a reputation as a fair-minded boss who rewarded good ideas, no matter where they came from.
Asked today if he regrets imposing his disciplinarian personality on his company, he makes a confession: “You don’t understand—I was never that disciplined myself, and I’m not even a morning person!” He was determined to impose discipline on Intel, he says, for two reasons that ultimately worked to the firm’s advantage. First, he wanted to avoid the outrageous double standards he had experienced at Fairchild. The meritocratic culture he created at Intel then helped it attract the best talent in the industry. Second, he knew that strong discipline would also be necessary to improve his firm’s shoddy manufacturing.
At the time the microchip business was producing such unreliable products that customers insisted that companies like Intel always license new products to a secondary supplier to ensure reliability of supply. His efforts to tighten up quality control led to a commercial coup. When his firm introduced its widely anticipated 386 processor, he stunned the industry by declaring that Intel would not license any secondary manufacturers. This was a huge risk for computer-makers, but such was their appetite for the new chip that they bought it anyway. Intel’s ability to deliver good enough chips in large numbers meant profits no longer had to be shared with secondary manufacturers.
With his reputation for ruthlessness in the marketplace and rigorous discipline inside his firm, Dr Grove has much in common with another American business leader: Lee Raymond, the formidable former chairman of Exxon Mobil. Both men were feared by both rivals and many of their employees. Dr Grove once even spearheaded a sales campaign against a superior chip made by Motorola in an effort dubbed “Operation Crush”. When asked about such bully-boy tactics, Dr Grove remains unrepentant. He even likes the comparison with the unloved oilman: “I never knew Lee Raymond, but he did take Exxon to the top of the Fortune 500—and that’s OK with me.”
Personal admiration aside, however, Dr Grove is convinced that Exxon and its Big Oil brethren are in a sunset industry. He has written and lectured widely on energy and environmental topics in recent years, arguing that oil and cars are heading for a divorce. He regards electricity as the most promising replacement fuel, and thinks battery technology has the potential to produce an Intel-like giant as the industry develops.
Another business he believes to be ripe for disruption is health care. He complains that the industry seems to innovate much too slowly. The lack of proper electronic medical records and smart “clinical decision systems” bothers him, as does the slow-moving, bureaucratic nature of clinical trials. He thinks pharmaceutical firms should study the fast “knowledge turns” achieved by chipmakers, so that the cycles of learning and innovation are accelerated. (A knowledge turn, a term coined by Dr Grove, is the time it takes for an experiment to proceed from hypothesis to results, and then to a new hypothesis—around 18 months in chipmaking, but 10-20 years in medicine.)
And what of chipmaking—is it, too, a sunset industry ripe for disruption? Dr Grove still believes in Moore’s law (with the caveat that it will get ever pricier for chipmakers to uphold) but he has a grave concern. At a recent ceremony honouring his achievements, he shocked the gathered bigwigs by declaring that the industry’s approach to hoarding patents was an abuse of intellectual-property rights and risked undermining its future. Asked to defend that claim, which upset even his own family members, he does not backtrack. He insists that firms must use their patents or lose them: “You can’t just sit on your ass and give everyone the finger.” Even though Dr Grove is no longer running Intel, it seems that his desire to shake things up is undimmed.
Friday, September 18, 2009
The Sound of Cricket
When I was living in Mumbai in the mid-’70s and cricket on television had not yet arrived, there was no greater pleasure than listening to BBC’s Test Match Special ball-by-ball radio commentary. There were such greats as Trevor Bailey, Norman Yardley, John Arlott, Brian Johnston, Fred Trueman, Christopher Martin-Jenkins. The producer’s brief was clear: convey the atmosphere on the ground and crack jokes. And don’t forget the cricket. Old ladies from Henley-on-Thames used to send Johnston freshly baked chocolate cakes which were consumed on air by the commentary team while wickets were falling! I remember the way Arlott signed off the air after a 35-year commentary career. He had, like Neville Cardus, become a legend. After his fellow commentators had paid him a fulsome tribute, Arlott remained silent and ended his stint on Test Match Special with the words: “And after Trevor Bailey, it will be Christopher Martin-Jenkins.” What a way to go!
A worthy successor to those greats is the Lancastrian David Lloyd. On TV during the recent Ashes series, he said of an English player: “If that fellow is a Test bowler, my backside is a fire engine!”
( Vinod Mehta, Outlook)
Alaskan Warning !
|
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Sehwag
India to spend USD 1300 bln on infrastructure......
Goldman Sachs expects most of the infrastructure investment to be funded by India's domestic savings without significant recourse to external borrowings. This belief stems from the trend of rising domestic savings rate and robust balance sheets of private sector companies. Goldman Sachs has pegged the gross savings rate in Asia's third largest economy to rise to 40% of GDP by 2016 (from 37% in FY09) and remain at high levels for well over a decade. These savings will be pertinent to fund public private partnership (PPP) projects that are estimated to fund 30% to 50% of the total infrastructure investment in the next decade.
However, what is even more important to note is that for this plan to fructify, India's household savings must be intermediated through the financial sector (pension funds, insurance and the like) to the government, which then spends on infrastructure. Else, as the chart shows, rising savings could possibly have little or no impact on public sector / infrastructure investments.
Allowing institutions like IIFCL to raise funds through long term bonds or allowing the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) to route investments from pension funds to equity and debt markets for the long term could be ideal ways to tap the potential savings.
Know facts and then conclude.....
Suddenly, the young man again shouted, "Papa see the pond and animals, clouds are moving with the train". The couple continued to watch the young man in embarrassment. Suddenly it started raining and some water drops touched the young man's hand. He was filled with joy and he closed his eyes and shouted again," Papa it's raining, water is touching me, see papa". The couple couldn't help themselves and asked the old man "why don't you visit the Doctor and get your son treated".
The old man replied "yes, we are actually coming back from the hospital. It so happens that today itself my son has got the eyes for first time in life".
Moral: Don’t draw conclusions until you know all the facts
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Small Is Manageable?
Dummies for finance
From The Economist print edition
Andreas Treichl of Erste Bank thinks banks should be kept small and simple
| |
HE MAY be descended from five generations of bankers and head a large bank himself, but Andreas Treichl has a pretty low opinion of his profession. He had hoped to become a conductor, but changed his mind on the advice of Leonard Bernstein. The maestro saw him perform, Mr Treichl says, and “told me to go into banking because one would do better as a mediocre banker than one would as a mediocre conductor.”
Happily, most observers consider his tenure at Erste Bank, Austria’s second biggest, which he has run for more than a decade, better than mediocre. He has transformed the staid, insular, 200-year-old savings bank into one of the largest retail banks in central and eastern Europe. Although he led it into a region that subsequently found itself on the front-line of the financial crisis, he has managed to keep it profitable and independent. To be sure, Erste Bank has not escaped the crisis unscathed. Earlier this year it had to raise €1.8 billion ($2.3 billion), including €1.2 billion from the Austrian government, to bolster its capital, and provisions for bad loans have more than doubled in the first half of this year compared with a year earlier. Yet these setbacks look inconsequential when set against the monstrous losses reported by bigger banks farther afield.
That Erste Bank continues to stagger on in perilous emerging markets while many of those that bet on American or British housing have fallen flat is explained, at least in part, by the fact that banking was not Mr Treichl’s first choice of career. He built a business on the assumption that commercial banks do not have the pick of the best or the brightest, and should therefore keep their strategies simple and their ambitions relatively modest.
“People who want to make a lot of money fast go to work in investment banks, but people who work in commercial banks are pretty average people,” says Mr Treichlin an office so understated that it almost seems calculatedly so. On the whiteboard near his desk are the colourful doodles of one of his three sons—testimony to a recent spot of baby-sitting. Near the door is an open carton containing dozens of boxes of chewing gum. Mr Treichl’s prescriptions for banking are as unpretentious as his office. “We should not think we can invent something brilliant. If we could we would be working somewhere else,” he says of the exotic credit derivatives that spread risk, like a contagion, through the financial system. “We bought the crap but we didn’t invent it.”
Mr Treichl’s keep-it-simple philosophy has steered his firm’s strategy. Instead of trying to expand into investment banking, a business with juicy margins in good times but horrible losses in bad, Erste Bank has instead concentrated on expanding its retail banking business into central and eastern Europe, where it has subsidiaries stretching from Austria to Ukraine. In most countries where it does business, it owns one of the larger local banks. In the Czech Republic, for instance, it holds almost a third of all retail deposits, and in Romania it has a quarter. Erste Bank also has a policy of balancing loans and deposits. In the go-go years before the credit crunch, that left it growing more slowly than many rivals. But because it did not rely on flighty capital markets for funds, it has weathered the downturn better. Conservatism has other rewards, too: being a big, safe-sounding bank in small countries has allowed it to pay uncompetitive interest rates and still keep pulling in deposits.
It is also firmly a local bank. Most of its main markets are just a few hours’ drive away from the head office in Vienna. In the waiting room on the executive floor, the head of risk from a subsidiary in a neighbouring country is pouring himself a coffee, having driven for an hour from his own office to talk about a new computer system. This localism underscores one of Mr Treichl’s deeply held beliefs: that big banks fail because they become unmanageable. “If you run something like Citi how the hell do you know what’s going on in Poland if you only go there every three years?” he asks. “This is very much a people business. I need to touch and smell and feel what’s going on.” It is a view formed by his many years in various bits of the far-flung empire of Chase Manhattan, a company about which former employees joke that it “trained the best but kept the rest”. Mr Treichl joined it as a credit analyst in New York and worked in its offices in Brussels, Athens and Vienna before joining Erste Bank some 15 years ago.
It is hard to find fault with the argument that many big banks have become ungovernable. Even HSBC, a British bank with a sterling reputation, ingrained prudence and a history of astute acquisitions has stumbled in recent years when entering markets where unfamiliarity prevented it from bringing these traits to bear. But there is a corollary. Size and geographic reach allow big banks to spread risk. Erste’s profitability over the next few years, by contrast, will depend on a few fragile economies in one small part of the world—albeit ones that are not moving in unison, and for which Austria has mustered an international bail-out.
Being decidedly local also carries other, idiosyncratic risks. Austrian banks have, in recent years, been enthusiastically peddling risky foreign-currency mortgages at home and abroad. Erste Bank was far from the worst culprit in this regard, but it did opt to issue some mortgages denominated in Swiss francs and euros to Hungarians and Romanians rather than entirely surrender a booming new business to more daring rivals.
Banking also has an annoying knack of turning today’s genius into tomorrow’s fool. Devotees of back-to-basics banking such as Mr Treichl and Banco Santander’s Emilio Botín are riding high only by comparison with racier (and now disgraced) rivals who tried to combine investment banking with retail and who boosted returns buying credit derivatives they did not understand. Yet their stars may also fall if a long economic slowdown produces bigger-than-expected losses at conservative banks, too.
CricTrivia
I've just seen Australia's Tim Paine run out for a duck on his ODI debut. How many people have suffered this fate?
Well, first of all it wasn't Tim Paine's first one-day international, as he also played against Scotland in Edinburgh the previous week, and scored 29 not out. But 20 people have been run out for a duck in their first one-day international, the most recent being Sri Lanka's Thilan Thushara against West Indies in St Lucia in April 2008. Five of the batsmen concerned - Roger Binny of India, Zimbabwe's Eddo Brandes, Ryan Hurley of West Indies, Bangladesh's Enamul Haque junior and England's Alex Loudon - were particularly unlucky, as they were run out without even facing a ball. In Loudon's case it was his one and only international match, against Sri Lanka at Chester-le-Street in 2006.
How many people have been out stumped by the same wicketkeeper off the same bowler in both innings of the same Test?
This has happened on 11 occasions now, most recently to Zimbabwe's Christopher Mpofu, who was stumped McCullum bowled Vettori in both innings against New Zealand in Harare in 2005. The previous one was Sri Lanka's Upul Chandana, stumped Gilchrist bowled Warne in both innings against Australia in Cairns in 2004. The first time it happened was in 1894-95, when England's Bobby Peel was stumped by Affie Jarvis off the bowling of Charles "Terror" Turner in both innings against Australia in Sydney, to complete his second successive pair. A further seven batsmen, making a total of 18, have been out stumped in both innings of a Test (but not off the same bowler).